PDA

View Full Version : Peak Oil


Michael
Nov 10th 2009, 01:20 PM
Well this is big news! The IEA is slowly coming around to admitting reality.

The world is much closer to running out of oil than official estimates admit, according to a whistleblower at the International Energy Agency who claims it has been deliberately underplaying a looming shortage for fear of triggering panic buying.

The senior official claims the US has played an influential role in encouraging the watchdog to underplay the rate of decline from existing oil fields while overplaying the chances of finding new reserves.

The allegations raise serious questions about the accuracy of the organisation's latest World Energy Outlook on oil demand and supply to be published tomorrow – which is used by the British and many other governments to help guide their wider energy and climate change policies.

In particular they question the prediction in the last World Economic Outlook, believed to be repeated again this year, that oil production can be raised from its current level of 83m barrels a day to 105m barrels. External critics have frequently argued that this cannot be substantiated by firm evidence and say the world has already passed its peak in oil production.

Now the "peak oil" theory is gaining support at the heart of the global energy establishment. "The IEA in 2005 was predicting oil supplies could rise as high as 120m barrels a day by 2030 although it was forced to reduce this gradually to 116m and then 105m last year," said the IEA source, who was unwilling to be identified for fear of reprisals inside the industry. "The 120m figure always was nonsense but even today's number is much higher than can be justified and the IEA knows this.

"Many inside the organisation believe that maintaining oil supplies at even 90m to 95m barrels a day would be impossible but there are fears that panic could spread on the financial markets if the figures were brought down further. And the Americans fear the end of oil supremacy because it would threaten their power over access to oil resources," he added.

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2009/11/09/OilProduction.gif

Source (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/09/peak-oil-international-energy-agency)

The IEA keeps getting forced to reduce their forecasts - and their forecasts are known as the most optimistic of all oil production forecasts to begin with.

It is beginning to look like we are 'at the peak' (right on schedule it seems). Most of the experts I've read have always pointed to the 90-95 million barrels production 'ceiling' that seems to actually exist no matter how much new drilling/exploration is done. Apparently for every new oil field added, an older field is running dry at a rate much faster than forecast (which is a key prediction of 'peak oil' theory).

Greendruid
Nov 10th 2009, 01:23 PM
Wow - this is BIG news. Not the peak oil issue itself but the admitting of the problem by the IEA. Time to increase Canada's military spending perhaps?

Donkey
Nov 10th 2009, 03:01 PM
Time to move closer to work. :/

I drive an embarassingly long way when I come in to the office three times a week. But even with rising energy costs, it wouldn't offset the low living expenses that I currently enjoy to relocate.

andrewl
Nov 10th 2009, 06:23 PM
Here is a graph from the oil drum that shows the disconnect between the IEA and reality:

http://www.theoildrum.com/files/ccst20090515.png

Note how we seem to at the steep decline part of the "oil drum" forecast.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5395

There is plenty more great information on the link. sorry about the size of the image.. how do i make it smaller??

Andrew

Americano
Nov 10th 2009, 06:54 PM
Here is a graph from the oil drum that shows the disconnect between the IEA and reality:

http://www.theoildrum.com/files/ccst20090515.png

Note how we seem to at the steep decline part of the "oil drum" forecast.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5395

There is plenty more great information on the link. sorry about the size of the image.. how do i make it smaller??

Andrew

If you don't have graphics or photo software this feebie will do it:

http://bluefive.pair.com/pixresizer.htm

(1024x768 pixels is good for the net)

Michael
Nov 10th 2009, 09:04 PM
...sorry about the size of the image.. how do i make it smaller??

Andrew
From a server side perspective, this big image doesn't use up DWF resources. The picture is hosted somewhere else and all you posted was an image link which is served from the host site. That photo doesn't use up much DWF bandwidth at all and virtually no drive-space either.

So from a forum administrator point-of-view, don't object to posting links to big photos (provided they are topical). Indeed, check out the Castle's thread in the History section! :)

andrewl
Apr 29th 2010, 06:09 PM
A graphic from the US dept of Energy. There is simply no way to make up that wedge of "unidentified projects".

http://www.countercurrents.org/arguimbau230410.htm

What does it imply? The supply of the world's most essential energy source is going off a cliff. Not in the distant future,but in a year and a half. Production of all liquid fuels, including oil, will drop within 20 years to half what it is today. And the difference needs to be made up with "unidentified projects," which one of the world's leading petroleum geologists says is just a "euphemism for rank shortage," and the world's foremost oil industry banker says is "faith based."

http://energybulletin.net/sites/default/files/images/eia1.jpg

Michael
Apr 29th 2010, 08:08 PM
Wow. I hate it when ugly and scary predictions from a dozen years ago turn out to be under-shooting the mark! :eek:

Peak oil and climate change both seem to do this...

Forget dropping to 50% oil production levels, a 5-10% production drop from present levels will cause HUGE disruption to world economies with skyrocketing prices in the short term. That chart shows a 5-10% decline by 2016! :eek: :eek:

Americano
May 1st 2010, 01:29 PM
Makes the US mandate of 35mpg cars in 2016 sound rather silly.

Donkey
May 1st 2010, 03:45 PM
Makes the US mandate of 35mpg cars in 2016 sound rather silly.
The fact that I get 34 mpg on my 15 year old car makes the 2016 deadline sound super silly.

Michael
May 2nd 2010, 09:28 AM
The fact that I get 34 mpg on my 15 year old car makes the 2016 deadline sound super silly.

US has a long history of passing lots of 'exemptions' to the rules to enable companies to cheat the rules.

For example, Crysler's PT Cruiser has long been classified as a "light truck" in order to get Crysler's overall fleet average within the law's range.

That kind of nonsense makes a mockery of the rule.

Btw, I've heard that every ounce of improved fuel efficiency developed since the mid-1970s has been used to enable larger vehicles to maintain the same fuel efficiency as before. That is to say, over the last 35 years, average fleet fuel efficiency has stayed the same, but overall, the size of the vehicles have increased dramatically. So basically, all the improvements in fuel efficiency has just encouraged Americans to flood the market with big-ass SUV's.