PDA

View Full Version : AIDS "epidemic" in Washington DC


dilettante
Mar 21st 2009, 10:13 PM
Did you guys see the articles on the AIDS rate in DC that came out this last week? I was stunned by the numbers and meant to create a thread at the time but was too busy preparing for a conference (it's amazing how hard it is to find an old news story online).

Report says 3 percent in DC have HIV or AIDS
5 days ago


WASHINGTON (AP) — A new report by D.C. health officials says that at least 3 percent of residents in the nation's capital are living with HIV or AIDS and every mode of transmission is on the rise.
The findings in the 2008 epidemiology report by the D.C. HIV/AIDS Administration point to a severe epidemic that's impacting every race and sex across the population and neighborhoods.
Scheduled to be released Monday, the report says that the number of HIV and AIDS cases jumped 22 percent from the nearly 12,500 reported in 2006. Almost 1 in 10 residents between ages 40 and 49 are living with HIV, and black men had the highest infection rate at almost 7 percent.
The report says that the virus is most often transmitted by men having sex with men, followed by heterosexual transmission and injection drug use.


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h_JbAEOzNwmOiownONsfoYNqzF-AD96V3CGO0

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1885601,00.html

Apparently a >1% rate is considered epidemic. The 1 in 10 figure for people in their 40s is just crazy.

I can't find the original article I saw on this, but it included yet another disturbing statistic: most cities only report AIDS rates, not including HIV infections that haven't developed that far; just looking at AIDS rates alone, 4 other cities have rates higher than DC's.

I realize that the reported increase represents better testing as much as an actual increase in cases (though that just implies that the problem has been this bad for a while, which is also disturbing), but, by the same token, since testing is still far from adequate, it seems that the actual percentage of infection could be even higher than these latest figures reflect.

I find it truly bizarre that we have a lethal, uncurable, but entirely preventable disease reaching far beyond epidemic proportions in the capital city of the United States.

Michael
Mar 22nd 2009, 10:28 AM
I find it truly bizarre that we have a lethal, uncurable, but entirely preventable disease reaching far beyond epidemic proportions in the capital city of the United States.
Fact is, apart from the Washington Mall and a couple of very nice suburbs (Georgetown in particular), Washington D.C. is one of the biggest and nastiest ghetto slums in the USA - that has actually been growing larger and poorer over time.

Americano
Mar 22nd 2009, 12:59 PM
Did you guys see the articles on the AIDS rate in DC that came out this last week? I was stunned by the numbers and meant to create a thread at the time but was too busy preparing for a conference (it's amazing how hard it is to find an old news story online).

Apparently a >1% rate is considered epidemic. The 1 in 10 figure for people in their 40s is just crazy.

I can't find the original article I saw on this, but it included yet another disturbing statistic: most cities only report AIDS rates, not including HIV infections that haven't developed that far; just looking at AIDS rates alone, 4 other cities have rates higher than DC's.

I realize that the reported increase represents better testing as much as an actual increase in cases (though that just implies that the problem has been this bad for a while, which is also disturbing), but, by the same token, since testing is still far from adequate, it seems that the actual percentage of infection could be even higher than these latest figures reflect.

I find it truly bizarre that we have a lethal, uncurable, but entirely preventable disease reaching far beyond epidemic proportions in the capital city of the United States.

You think the fundies need to legislate abstinence as a solution?

dilettante
Mar 22nd 2009, 02:12 PM
You think the fundies need to legislate abstinence as a solution?

I'm not sure what the solution here is. Though extreme, invasive, unenforceable legislation should probably be restricted to 'Plan B.' :)

I makes me wonder if education is really the answer, though, at least in the case of DC. Do these people really lack the knowledge that HIV is transmitted via unprotected intercourse and used needles? I doubt that. I also doubt that there's really a shortage of cheap, available condoms in Washington.

I'm more inclined to think that this is a deeper problem; that it isn't about not knowing but not caring, or at least not caring enough to put knowledge into practice. That not caring may be a symptom of quality of life issues or of economic hopelessness or of something else.

Americano
Mar 22nd 2009, 02:24 PM
I'm not sure what the solution here is. Though extreme, invasive, unenforceable legislation should probably be restricted to 'Plan B.' :)

I makes me wonder if education is really the answer, though, at least in the case of DC. Do these people really lack the knowledge that HIV is transmitted via unprotected intercourse and used needles? I doubt that. I also doubt that there's really a shortage of cheap, available condoms in Washington.

I'm more inclined to think that this is a deeper problem; that it isn't about not knowing but not caring, or at least not caring enough to put knowledge into practice. That not caring may be a symptom of quality of life issues or of economic hopelessness or of something else.

I was being facetious and agree with your observation of not caring due to their quality of life and economic hopelessness.

Dominick
Mar 22nd 2009, 08:32 PM
The world accustomed itself to syphilis and it will accomodate itself to AIDS. From a certain death sentence it's already become a manageable disease and it is wont to become similar to syphilis or gonorhea, i.e. a STD with relatively low risk.
Plagues will always be around. None has ever exterminated mankind or even brough a significant dent in the global population explosion.

Greendruid
Mar 24th 2009, 12:24 AM
I saw a frightening HIV/AIDS documentary produced through the CBC by one of the Trudeau boys a few years back. It was done in Uganda amongst refugee children that were in camps either due to war and/or losing their parents due to HIV/AIDS. Some of them were born with HIV from infected breast milk. Others contracted it from unprotected sex. IV drug use was not a common cause. One 16-year old held the perspective that since he had AIDS but was young and sexual, he didn't care if he spread the disease. He felt that he was going to die anyway so what did it matter that he would take others with him? I can't imagine being born into this hopelessness but it certainly impacts the way the epidemic plays out. Meanwhile, those with the means to help laugh silently as Africa de-populates itself through AIDS, war and famine. Joseph Ratzinger (http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/03/17/pope-africa-condoms.html) is a helpful old bastard isn't he?