PDA

View Full Version : How harmful is nuclear radiation? It depends on


kowalskil
Mar 22nd 2011, 12:47 PM
How harmful is nuclear radiation? It depends on the dose received.

Tsunami-related Fukushina accident will probably renew debates about nuclear electricity. Such debates should be based on what is known about negative effects of nuclear radiation. Numerical data below should be useful in that context.

The effect of penetrating radiation on a person depends on the dose received. The common unit of dose is Sievert (Sv). Smaller doses are expressed in milliseverts (mSv) or microseveret. The old unit of dose, rem, is also used widely (1Sv=100 rem)

A dose of 10 Sv will most likely results in death, within a day or two.
5 Sv would is kill about 50% of exposed people.
2 Sv can also be fatal, especially without prompt treatment.

0.25 Sv = 250 mSv is the limit for emergency workers in life-saving operations.
0.10 Sv = 100 mSv dose is clearly linked to later cancer risks.
0.05 Sv = 50 mSv is the yearly limit for radiation workers.

0.004 Sv= 4 mSv typical yearly dose due to natural radiation (cosmic rays, etc).
0.003 Sv= 3 mSV typical dose from mammogram

The one day dose, due to Fukushima accident, at a distance of 30 miles from the damaged reactors, was reported (on 3/16 and 3/17) as 0.0036 mSv. I do not have data on doses, probably very large, received by those who worked near or inside reactors. But I have no doubt that each of them was carrying an individual dosimeter. No deaths due to radiation have been reported in Japan, as far as I know. Many lives, however, were lost in Chernobyl, by those who worked to minimize damage.

Ludwik Kowalski
Professor Emeritus
Montclair State University, USA
.

Michael
Mar 22nd 2011, 06:28 PM
How harmful is nuclear radiation? It depends on the dose received.

Tsunami-related Fukushina accident will probably renew debates about nuclear electricity. Such debates should be based on what is known about negative effects of nuclear radiation. Numerical data below should be useful in that context.

The effect of penetrating radiation on a person depends on the dose received. The common unit of dose is Sievert (Sv). Smaller doses are expressed in milliseverts (mSv) or microseveret. The old unit of dose, rem, is also used widely (1Sv=100 rem)

A dose of 10 Sv will most likely results in death, within a day or two.
5 Sv would is kill about 50% of exposed people.
2 Sv can also be fatal, especially without prompt treatment.

0.25 Sv = 250 mSv is the limit for emergency workers in life-saving operations.
0.10 Sv = 100 mSv dose is clearly linked to later cancer risks.
0.05 Sv = 50 mSv is the yearly limit for radiation workers.

0.004 Sv= 4 mSv typical yearly dose due to natural radiation (cosmic rays, etc).
0.003 Sv= 3 mSV typical dose from mammogram

The one day dose, due to Fukushima accident, at a distance of 30 miles from the damaged reactors, was reported (on 3/16 and 3/17) as 0.0036 mSv. I do not have data on doses, probably very large, received by those who worked near or inside reactors. But I have no doubt that each of them was carrying an individual dosimeter. No deaths due to radiation have been reported in Japan, as far as I know. Many lives, however, were lost in Chernobyl, by those who worked to minimize damage.

Ludwik Kowalski
Professor Emeritus
Montclair State University, USA
.

I suspect that the emergency workers at the striken reactor site are dropping like flies right now and it is not being publicized. Or we will have to wait until after this is over to get the real story. Japanese government has never been known for being public and open with information.

Margot
Mar 22nd 2011, 06:28 PM
I found this (http://xkcd.com/radiation/) to be a really enlightening way to put radiation levels in perspective.

Americano
Mar 22nd 2011, 07:42 PM
Perhaps someone with that sort of knowledge can use the posted information to determine what doses are in Japan near the disaster area. I've read 1600 times normal which brings Kamikazes to mind regarding those workers attempting to contain the disaster.

Greendruid
Mar 24th 2011, 12:24 AM
What is the treatment for radiation exposures beyond acceptable limits? I don't understand how that stuff is removed from the cells and tissues it damages.

timn8ter
Mar 24th 2011, 12:45 AM
If I were there I'd be more concerned about contamination than irradiation. If that stuff gets into your food and/or water you're screwed.

dilettante
Mar 24th 2011, 08:30 AM
I found this (http://xkcd.com/radiation/) to be a really enlightening way to put radiation levels in perspective.

That's pretty cool. I love xkcd.

timn8ter
Mar 25th 2011, 02:51 AM
That's an excellent graphic illustrating that it's not exposure alone but time+exposure.

cshaun
Nov 13th 2011, 09:24 PM
People go extreme when they hear the word nuclear or even radiation but they should be exposed to the fact that not all types of radiation are harmful. They are present in our everyday life, with all the appliances we use at home. But you do not hear just about someone dying from tv radiation.

But rather, it is an accumulation of what you are exposed to. I think that people are reading too much information on the internet that may not prove to be true all the time.