Michael
Jun 21st 2010, 10:48 AM
I saw a news item this morning about how successful and popular the Iraqi 'stray-dog-cull' was going in Bahgdad.
On the opposite end of that spectrum are the stray-dogs of Moscow, some of which routinely ride the metro system!
http://media.ft.com/cms/f0ea78f0-ff2b-11de-a677-00144feab49a.jpg
The stray dogs of Moscow are mentioned for the first time in the reports of the journalist and writer Vladimir Gilyarovsky in the latter half of the 19th century. But Poyarkov says they have been there as long as the city itself. They remain different from wolves, in particular because they exhibit pronounced “polymorphism” – a range of behavioural traits shaped in part by the “ecological niche” they occupy. And it is this ability to adapt that explains why the population density of strays is so much greater than that of wolves. “With several niches there are more resources and more opportunities.”
The dogs divide into four types, he says, which are determined by their character, how they forage for food, their level of socialisation to people and the ecological niche they inhabit.
Article (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/628a8500-ff1c-11de-a677-00144feab49a.html)
The article is very interesting - obviously some different sociology between Moscow and Bahgdad!
On the opposite end of that spectrum are the stray-dogs of Moscow, some of which routinely ride the metro system!
http://media.ft.com/cms/f0ea78f0-ff2b-11de-a677-00144feab49a.jpg
The stray dogs of Moscow are mentioned for the first time in the reports of the journalist and writer Vladimir Gilyarovsky in the latter half of the 19th century. But Poyarkov says they have been there as long as the city itself. They remain different from wolves, in particular because they exhibit pronounced “polymorphism” – a range of behavioural traits shaped in part by the “ecological niche” they occupy. And it is this ability to adapt that explains why the population density of strays is so much greater than that of wolves. “With several niches there are more resources and more opportunities.”
The dogs divide into four types, he says, which are determined by their character, how they forage for food, their level of socialisation to people and the ecological niche they inhabit.
Article (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/628a8500-ff1c-11de-a677-00144feab49a.html)
The article is very interesting - obviously some different sociology between Moscow and Bahgdad!